home   Government Bastardry Index

  OR ARE WE GOING TO WAR? 

  By: Tamim Ansary 

  I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO
 Talk Radio today, allowed that this would mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with
  this atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage. What else can we do?" Minutes later I
  heard some TV pundit discussing whether we "have the belly to do what must be done." 

  And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I am from Afghanistan, and even
  though I've lived here for 35 years I've never lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who
  will listen how it all looks from where I'm standing. 

  I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is no doubt in my mind that these
  people were responsible for the atrocity in New York. I agree that something must be done about those
  monsters. 

  But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the government of Afghanistan. The
  Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political
  criminal with a plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden, think Hitler. And when
  you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in the concentration camps." It's not only that the
  Afghan people had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were the first victims of the perpetrators. They
  would exult if someone would come in there, take out the Taliban and clear out the rats nest of international
  thugs holed up in their country. 

  Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The answer is, they're starved,
  exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering. A few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are
  500,000 disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food. There are millions of
  widows. And the Taliban has been burying these widows alive in mass graves. The soil is littered with land
  mines, the farms were all destroyed by the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons why the Afghan people
  have not 
  overthrown the Taliban. 

  We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age. Trouble is, that's been
  done. The Soviets took care of it already. Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their
  houses? Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done. Eradicate their hospitals? Done. Destroy
  their infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine and health care? Too late. Someone already did all that.
  New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would they at least get the Taliban? Not likely. In 
  today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around. They'd slip away and
  hide. Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, they don't move too fast, they don't
  even have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the
  criminals who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only be making common cause with the Taliban--by
  raping once again the people they've been raping all this time. 

  So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with true fear and trembling. The only
  way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do
  what needs to be done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to kill as many as needed. Having the
  belly to overcome any moral qualms about killing innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand.
  What's actually on the table is Americans dying. And not just because some Americans would die fighting
  their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's much bigger than that folks. Because to get any
  troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would they let us? Not likely. The conquest of
  Pakistan would have to be first. Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You see where I'm going. We're
  flirting with a world war 
  between Islam and the West. 

  And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants. That's why he did this. Read his
  speeches and statements. It's all right there. He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem
  ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarise the world into Islam and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If
  the west wreaks a holocaust in those lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's even better
  from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong, in the end the west would win, whatever that would
  mean, but the war would last for years and millions would die, not just theirs but ours. 

  Who has the belly for that? Bin Laden does. Anyone else? 

  Tamim Ansary 
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
  "All have equal right to live here. This universe is for all. It is not the patrimony of human beings only." 
                                                                                                                     Shrii Shrii Anandamurti 
  PROUT (Progressive Utilisation Theory) is a new socio-economic philosophy that uniquely integrates 
  the spiritual dimension of life, recognizing that balanced progress involves physical, mental and spiritual harmony.
  A 680 word outline is
  available from bdyer@prout.org
  Alternatively check out www.prout.org & www.proutworld.org

home   Top of Page