|
home
Government Bastardry Index
OR ARE WE GOING TO WAR?
By: Tamim Ansary
I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back
to the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO
Talk Radio today, allowed that this would mean killing innocent
people, people who had nothing to do with
this atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral
damage. What else can we do?" Minutes later I
heard some TV pundit discussing whether we "have the belly to
do what must be done."
And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because
I am from Afghanistan, and even
though I've lived here for 35 years I've never lost track of
what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who
will listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.
I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There
is no doubt in my mind that these
people were responsible for the atrocity in New York. I agree
that something must be done about those
monsters.
But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not
even the government of Afghanistan. The
Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics who took over Afghanistan
in 1997. Bin Laden is a political
criminal with a plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When
you think Bin Laden, think Hitler. And when
you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in the
concentration camps." It's not only that the
Afghan people had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were
the first victims of the perpetrators. They
would exult if someone would come in there, take out the Taliban
and clear out the rats nest of international
thugs holed up in their country.
Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban?
The answer is, they're starved,
exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering. A few years ago,
the United Nations estimated that there are
500,000 disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy,
no food. There are millions of
widows. And the Taliban has been burying these widows alive
in mass graves. The soil is littered with land
mines, the farms were all destroyed by the Soviets. These are
a few of the reasons why the Afghan people
have not
overthrown the Taliban.
We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the
Stone Age. Trouble is, that's been
done. The Soviets took care of it already. Make the Afghans
suffer? They're already suffering. Level their
houses? Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done.
Eradicate their hospitals? Done. Destroy
their infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine and health
care? Too late. Someone already did all that.
New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would
they at least get the Taliban? Not likely. In
today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat, only they have the
means to move around. They'd slip away and
hide. Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans,
they don't move too fast, they don't
even have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul and dropping bombs
wouldn't really be a strike against the
criminals who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only
be making common cause with the Taliban--by
raping once again the people they've been raping all this time.
So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak
with true fear and trembling. The only
way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with ground troops. When
people speak of "having the belly to do
what needs to be done" they're thinking in terms of having the
belly to kill as many as needed. Having the
belly to overcome any moral qualms about killing innocent people.
Let's pull our heads out of the sand.
What's actually on the table is Americans dying. And not just
because some Americans would die fighting
their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's much
bigger than that folks. Because to get any
troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would
they let us? Not likely. The conquest of
Pakistan would have to be first. Will other Muslim nations just
stand by? You see where I'm going. We're
flirting with a world war
between Islam and the West.
And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what
he wants. That's why he did this. Read his
speeches and statements. It's all right there. He really believes
Islam would beat the west. It might seem
ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarise the world into
Islam and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If
the west wreaks a holocaust in those lands, that's a billion
people with nothing left to lose, that's even better
from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong, in the
end the west would win, whatever that would
mean, but the war would last for years and millions would die,
not just theirs but ours.
Who has the belly for that? Bin Laden does. Anyone else?
Tamim Ansary
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"All have equal right to live here. This universe is for all.
It is not the patrimony of human beings only."
Shrii Shrii Anandamurti
PROUT (Progressive Utilisation Theory) is a new socio-economic
philosophy that uniquely integrates
the spiritual dimension of life, recognizing that balanced progress
involves physical, mental and spiritual harmony.
A 680 word outline is
available from bdyer@prout.org
Alternatively check out www.prout.org
& www.proutworld.org
home Top of
Page
|