|
10-12-2001
INTRODUCTION. Before I wade into the subject proper, let me remind you that maybe your concept of electricity as taught in school may be a little suspect. For example, we talk of electric generators. This conjures the image of electricity being made. So if you imagine the normal scenario of a city using a remotely located power ‘ generator’, located at some distance from the city ( this may be many miles away ), it implies that the ‘ generated ’electron has to travel to the city to be utilised. Further, as most power generators now utilise alternating current ( AC ), that means that the polarity is positive for one ½ cycle and negative for the other ½ cycle. We now have a problem. We have the ludicrous situation where our poor electron ( after being generated ), leaves the country and starts it’s trip toward the big smoke. But due to distance, it does not get there as the voltage has been reversed ( for the other half cycle ) and our poor little traveller has to return to the power station! Thus no power gets to the city if the ‘ generator ’ is of a sufficient distance from the load ( or consuming device ). Obviously something wrong with the generator theory somewhere. Let me say from the outset, that electricity cannot be made or used up by man. Electricity is not a substance as such, and you may have to rethink some of the accepted views. There is a ‘ magic ’ triangle that is made up of electricity, magnetism and gravity. The Joe cell can tap into this triangle ( imagine the cell energy as being in the middle of the triangle ) and changing the balance of the ‘ sides ’ can thus have full control of transmutation, gravity and many other effects. If you imagine the cell ‘ force ’ as a very high frequency AC voltage, ( NOT A GAS! ) you may realise that a power supply designed to ‘ fill ’ the cell with this type of energy would be a far superior way to go as compared to a conventional power supply or a standard car battery that has a far more meagre contribution of this type of ‘ electricity’. Never-the-less, you can make a very good cell indeed without resorting to a special power supply. Before I forget, let me again remind you that when Joe is talking about a negative field around the outside of the cell, he is not talking about placing your negative lead to the outer container. He is referring to ‘ true negative ’ or negative electricity, NOT to be confused with standard electrical potential’s of positive and negative. Thus after finishing with your start up procedures on the cell ( see related paper ), ALWAYS finish with the negative lead connected to the central ( inner ) cylinder. As said many times, there are no exception to this rule, on this planet at least. <g> SOME SCIENCE. Nuclei with a positive charge and electrons with a negative charge has long been regarded as the ‘ norm ’ and is how present science see the world and the matter that it is composed of. However, as we live in an illusionary world , reality is sometimes the direct opposite of what our far from perfect senses relay to us as concrete facts. For example, we all ‘ know ’ that the railway lines do not really meet at the distant horizon, and we also ‘ know ’ that a city floating in the air is merely a mirage. Thus we also ‘ know ’ that there is only one type of electricity, the normal one that we all use and have measured with test equipment ad nauseam. But what if there are in actuality negative nuclei and positive electrons ( positrons )? Another parallel so called world, a mirror of all that we see as normal and thus ‘ fact ’. Yes, we would have atoms and the mirror anti-atoms, and these would form anti-molecules and finally anti-life. Exactly the same as we see normality. but simply a mirror image. Of course this would also apply to electrical charge, magnetism, etc. Before you say that all this is old news and that I should come up to speed, let me say that I am aware of the particles made by particle accelerators such as at CERN in Geneva, and yes, I am also aware of the use of positrons as in the technique called PET ( positron emission tomography ). And I have read the works of P. A. M. Dirac and his famous quantum theory calculations in 1929. Yes, it was Dirac who postulated that particles and antiparticles have identical masses but opposite charges. When these little fellows get to meet, they annihilate each other and as a result charges are neutralised and the masses are converted to energy. Please remember this fact for my theory section at the end of this paper. This energy can be X-ray photons, gamma rays or mesons. Whilst on the subject and to put some perspective to the energies involved, let me quote you an example. The rate at which solar energy ( solar radiant power or luminosity ) reaches the Earth is about one kilowatt on each square meter. This is very useful and useable power indeed, and also goes to show the very poor efficiency of present day solar panels. Back to the subject. What has all this to do with the cell and who really cares? Please be patient, a brick wall is erected a brick at a time. <g> PROOF? So, what do we know about negative electricity in relation to the Joe cell? Of course we have Joe’s words on the topic as relayed to us by his many visitors, but as this is the talk of the ‘ inventor ’, we really require some other ‘ proof ’ that is independent of possible bias or deliberate inaccuracy. At this point, let me remind the reader that Joe has not put one word on paper ( over a 10 year period ), or allowed one photograph to be taken ( not from lack of asking by myself and others ), that may be used to help resolve the dilemma. On the contrary, Joe has gone to great lengths to hide his ‘ secret ’, by evading the topic or by giving nonsensical answers to questions and sometimes even laying down deliberate smoke screens to further confuse the issue. He obviously has his reasons and I respect his right not to share his discoveries with us. God bless you Joe. In passing, the videos that are in circulation are poor quality videos made by amateurs for friends, and that have been circulated without Joe’s consent. As such it has been left to a few to try to convert the crumbs that fall from Joe’s table into a loaf of bread that can feed the rest of the world. As mentioned at the start, positrons are a fact of life in the scientific community, but of course the scientific community will not recognise the Joe cell. In fact talk about the cell in scientific circles will guarantee a belly laugh, scorn or simply result in you being ostracised and treated similar to a person who is reporting on a UFO sighting. On the other hand, things are very different amongst the clandestine research scientists, but then of course these dudes are not going to come out in public, put their arm around you and declare on national TV that you are on the right track. Sorry, life was not meant to be easy. Unfortunately I have to resort to various ‘ proofs ’ that result from many experiments performed by ‘ pseudo scientist ’. This is meant to be a derogatory term as used by the ‘ certified experts ’ as a description of thousands of honest and dedicated self taught individuals that devote their whole lives to a radical project, ( usually with no help or money ) but usually with very noble aims. My favourite and a very enlightened individual whose work ( like Tesla ) has not received the accolades that it deserves is: WALTER RUSSELL. Born in Boston in May 19, 1871. He started experiencing annual periods of illumination. During a 39 day period of illumination in 1921, he believed he received the secrets of the universe from God, which he was asked to share with the world. In 1948 he married Lao Russell, and together they founded the University of Science and Philosophy for the purpose of spreading these teachings throughout the world. Russell passed away in 1963 and Lao in 1988. As we know ( if you believe in the subject that is ), there has been many avatars walking this earth and spruiking all forms of truths and otherwise. However, there is a great scarcity of individuals that have been told the scientific facts by ‘ God ’ and as such we should pay very careful attention to what they have to say. That is of course after first proving to the best of our abilities that the individuals are not deluded and merely not taking their medication. From What Russell has demonstrated by deed and word, I for one am a very serious listener to his scientific views. Russell has written many books on the topic and as far as the cell research is concerned, negative electricity has a very good ( and very difficult to comprehend ) write up in his book " The Universal One ". Some of his thoughts on the different types of electricity. * Positive electricity is the generative electricity. Positive electricity is that state of motion in which electricity dominates magnetism. Positive electricity is that state of motion in which centripetal force dominates centrifugal force. * Negative electricity is the radiative energy. Negative electricity is that state of motion in which magnetism dominates electricity. Negative electricity is that state of motion in which centrifugal forcer dominates centripetal force. * Electricity and magnetism exist as separate appearances only when opposed. In non-opposition they disappear, they become one. * Electricity and magnetism are not two separate forces, nor are they two separate substances. They are merely two different dimensions of motion. They belong solely to motion and not to substance. * Neither are positive and negative electricity two kinds of electricity. Positive and negative electricity are but two differing potential’s of the same force which must move in opposite directions. As I said, Russell has written may books and it would take a life time of very serious reading to fully comprehend what he is trying to pass to us. I am only relaying on to you sufficient to formulate a theory that I hold. RELATED DEVICES. If you have been in the ‘ alternative energy ’ scene for a while, you will no doubt be aware of many, many experimenters working on many devices. I will not bore you with a long list of experimenter’s and their related research. You can very easily look up your favourite experimenter by simply using the Web and a suitable search engine. Please realise that all you read is not fact and that there are a lot of grey areas, including in what you are reading now. Sorry, I am doing my best, but I am fallible. <g> You can use Nikola Tesla, Johm Bedini, John Searl, Floyd Sweet, Robert Adams and Edwin Gray as representative examples of the inventors that I am talking about. However, you will notice that some peculiarities as displayed by the cell is common to many of these devices. To name a few, the device goes cold when operating, the device shows magnetic anomalies in the near vicinity of the experiment, the device may be surrounded with a blue or pink glow, the device will build up a very strong ‘ electric ’ charge and the device may display some form of gravity anomalies. Different cells made by many different experimenter’s, and located in various parts of the world, have displayed some or all of the above anomalies. For the purpose of this short paper, I will stick to the electrical portion of the cell anomalous behaviour. THEORY. I will place here some points that you may want to consider. As usual it is early days in this research and as usual I will have the people in the know ( like Joe ) laughing their heads off at my puny attempts, but at least it is an attempt and it may seed a far better idea that you may have. Please share it, do not sit on it like Joe and many other selfish individuals. * A high frequency cell generated or accumulated force will create a magnetic field. This is easily proven with a compass or a magnet on a piece of string. The cell’s stainless steel tubes that you did such a good job of testing for magnetism, will now have a very strong North South field in the vertical axis. And this field is not in the steel, for when you pour out the water the cell will go back to ‘ normal ’. From the above, I assume that the resonant field ( and thus this magnetism ) is a function of the resonant cavity of which the water forms an integral part, ie. no water, no magnetism. In simple terms we have what is commonly called a ‘ tank circuit’ and this tank circuit is generating a unique magnetic field that is DIFFERENT from a magnetic field created by a steady DC ( direct current ) as may be created by a normal car battery. Tesla referred to it as a ‘ hysterical ’ magnetic field. As referred to hysteresis and not to somebody that has lost the plot. <g> * The magnitude of the above hysterical field is the unbalancing of the three force triangle towards the gravitational effects and explains the Joe cell gravitational anomalies ( to me at least ). To rephrase the above, if the balance of the two forces ( electricity and magnetism ) is upset or if you could nearly remove one of them, gravity as we call it would be negated. Walter Russel stated that the electro-magnetic process of mass formation ( centripetal ) is balanced by the attractive power of electricity and the dissipating ( centrifugal ) repelling power of magnetism. * Please remember that our teacher is Nature. Nature does her tricks with simple elegance and thus is using the proper energy efficient tools. As you can see by the above example we only have to upset the electro-magnetic balance and enormous power is at our disposal. The Joe cell can do this and you have to respect the logic of some of the individuals are hell bent on keeping the methods secret from the rest of us. ENGINE EXAMPLE. As most people are interested in running an engine on the cell, let me show you the balance of the two forces, again with thanks to Walter Russell. Intake stroke. Compression stroke Negative, expanding. Positive, contracting Negative, cooling system Positive, heating system Negative, increasing volume Positive, lessening volume Negative, discharging Positive, charging Negative, opening spirals Positive, closing spirals Negative, lowering potential’s Positive, increasing potential Negative, radiating Positive, generating What am I on about? Let me tell you. When a piston is at the top of the compression stroke, the compressed air molecules are ‘ charging ’ and require an ‘ increase in potential ’ or in other words, they need additional electrical charge or as Joe like to say, more electrons. These are supplied to a large degree from the cylinder walls. But, let us assume that the Joe cell has somehow removed all ‘ spare ’ electrons from the engine block. What now? Where do you get them from, as surely you must? Would it be possible for the compressed air to behave differently and maybe contribute some negative ( mirror ) electricity ( as in the science section above )? We know as a scientific fact that the annihilation of the two different particle masses ( the normal and the mirror ) contribute energy. This resultant energy may cause an expansion of the captured air charge and thus result in the ‘ push ’ that pushes the piston down. Why not? On this line, Russell stated that a sudden lowering of potential would cause an explosion, a flame tor a luminous streak. Good enough for me, you of course can make you own assumptions. Again on the same subject, please remember that Joe stated that a spark plug ignition was not required, only the electro-magnetic pulse at the right time from the car coil ( a crude form of a Tesla coil ). Remember my theory ( like hundreds of others ) is an unproven fact, and you are more than welcome to modify and improve on my humble contribution. That is called science. CONCLUSION. This article is here to make you think, comprehend and maybe lead you to some answers. I feel very comfortable with the notion that the Joe cell ( and similar devices ) utilises a form of energy that is the same ( in many ways ) to a mysterious energy that has appeared for many other experimenters and equally baffled them. In all cases, the energy ‘ appeared ’ due to a manipulation of electricity and magnetism. I also believe that the source of this energy is present everywhere in abundance, and is the only energy that we should be using, and is our only hope in saving mankind and Mother Earth. I also think that the Joe cell is the simplest and most elegant way of accumulating and utilising this great gift from our Creator. I have dedicated my life to this quest, and I feel very humble in the Lord allowing me to be a very small player in the experimenting with, and the resultant sharing of my research with my fellow brothers. My last word on the subject is, that unless we all share the work and thus become a force to be reckoned with, the few but extremely powerful moguls will always keep us in bondage and ignorance.
****************************************
|